OK, most of you are wondering if the BitComet ban will be lifted here, and the answer is no, and it will most likely never be unbanned here.

Most of you think BitComet is "faster" than other clients, but what u don't know is the reason why.

The reason why is because of its countless "cheating like" characteristics, for example:
* it hamers the tracker, and pays no attention to the tracker when it tells the client how long to wait before re-announce.
* when it gets snubed by another peer (basically meaning the peer refuses to give the BC client any upload because it has not been given any download from the BC client, the BC client then disconnects up to 10+ times per second to that client in an attempt to get unsnubed.
* It has no (working) upload slot limit, so it makes the upload bandwith so streached out that each peer only gets a few 100 bytes per second or less.
* The new encrypt header feature in BC 0.60 gave it a very unfair advantage and would basically prefer itself over uploading to other tpyes of clients. (afaik, uTorrent is working on a similar feature, but will be making it public information, so that all other clients can implement it if their authours wish to; this is the only real way for this to be effective)
* If you request too many pieces from it (something around 100? or so), it drops ALL your requests.
* It also abuses super-seeding by disconnecting and reconnecting to get a slot, and basically monopolize the super-seeder's bandwidth.
* It has an abusive multi-tracker implementation (announces to all trackers in all tier always).
* It also does stupid things when making torrents (such as not use UTF-8 as the encoding for chinese, japanese, and korean users that make torrents)

The truth of the matter is, BitComet is faster, because it makes ALL other clients slow by the reasons i listed and more; the whole BitTorrent community would be a lot better off if everyone banned BitComet.

And as a final note, the BitComet developers have known about this issue for months now, and are only now just releaseing BC 0.61 which still does have some very minor DHT leak bugs, and crashes on many systems.

OK，你們大都在想，對於BitComet的封禁會不會在這裡被解除，答案是不會，並且極有可能它永遠也不會被解禁。

你們大都認為，BitComet比其他的客戶端更"快"，但是你們不知道它更"快"的原因。
原因就是它的數不清的疑似欺詐的特徵。例如：

# 它損害tracker，並且當tracker告訴客戶端在下次announce前要等待多久時，它毫不理會。
# 當它被另一個節點冷落的時候（主要是另一個節點拒絕給某BC客戶端任何上傳，因為該節點此前並沒有從該BC客戶端獲得任何下載）該BC客戶端將以高達每秒鐘10+次的頻率反覆連接該節點，企圖從該節點獲得數據。
# 當它上傳時沒有並發連接數的限制，結果是使得上傳帶寬如此的分散，每個節點僅能得到0.1k/s或者更低的速率。
# BC 0.60 新設計的加密header訊息的特徵，使它相對於其它的BT軟體，攫取了一項非常不公平的優勢，當BC在上傳時會優先於其它的BT軟體選擇使用BC的用戶。（據我所知，uTorrent工作於一個類似的機制上，但是會公佈該訊息，如果其他的BT客戶端軟體作者願意的話他們也可以實現此功能，這才是唯一真正有效率的做法）
# 如果你從它那裡請求過多的塊（100左右？大約），它將會丟棄你所有的請求。
# 它也會通過反覆連接和斷開連接來獲得並發連接數，不當的使用超級種子，並且基本上獨佔超級種子的所有帶寬。
# 它有一項濫用的多tracker執行（總是在所有的層級中向所有的tracker來announce）。
# 當製作種子的時候，它會做一些愚蠢的事情（例如在中國、日本、韓國的使用者製作種子時，它不使用UTF-8編碼）。

問題的實質是，BitComet更"快"了，因為它通過上述種種做法使其他的所有BT軟體變慢了；如果人人抵制BitComet，整個BT世界將會好很多！附帶說明一下，BitComet的開發者在數月前就已經知道了關於它的這一討論，但是現在他們的做法僅僅是放出來了一個BC 0.61該版本仍然有一些較小的使DHT網路洩漏的bugs並且在很多系統上發生崩潰。對於那些自以為可以通過破解BC客戶端（或者使用欺騙補丁）來使得它可以運行的"大佬"們，當你們的帳號被封禁時，別來對著我哭。